Laboratory Research Interests:
Acanthamoeba
 
Cell and Molecular Biology of Growth and Differentiation.
Induction of encystment by metabolic inhibitors.
Antibiotic resistance.
Mode of reproduction.
Molecular phylogeny-based taxonomy.
Use of 18S rDNA sequences in identification of isolates.
 
 Acanthamoeba is a genus of small free-living amoebae that are ubiquitous in nature. The organisms are opportunistic pathogens that cause several rare diseases in humans. These include a central nervous system disease known as Granulomatous Amoebic Encephalitis (GAE), a sight-threatening eye disease known as Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK), and various secondary infections associated with immunocompromised individuals such as AIDS patients. Acanthamoebae also have been associated with disease in a variety of animals other than humans.
 

Cell and molecular biology of growth and differentiation.
 
Early studies focused on relationships between environmental factors and cell growth, multiplication and cyst formation [Reviewed in Byers, 1979]. We studied the induction of encystment by glucose-acetate starvation [Byers, Akins, Maynard et al., 1980], the uncoupling of nuclear and cytoplasmic division by physical agitation [James & Byers, 1967], photoinhibbition of cell multiplication [Dolphin,1968], changes during culture aging in oxygen consumption and RNA, DNA, protein and polysaccharide levels [Byers, Rudick & Rudick, 1969], relationships between nucleic acid synnthesis and degradation during growth and encystment [V. Rudick, 1971; King, 1980], evidence for lysosomal enzymes and changes in acid hydrolase activity during growth and encystment [Martin & Byers, 1976, 1977], morphological changes and requirements for macromolecule synthesis during excystment [Mattar & Byers, 1971], and polyamine content and metabolism during growth and differentiation [Kim, Sobota, Bitonti et al., 1987].  Collectively, these studies revealed extensive changes in macromolecule content and metabolism that begin while amoebae are still in mid-logarithmic growth, thus, bringing into question the common practice of using late logarithimic phase cultures for many biological studies.

Return to top of page.



Induction of encystment by metabolic inhibitors and
the encystment enhancing activity EEA.
 
We used metabolic inhibitors in an attempt to understand the initiation of cell differentiation (encystment).  Agents tested included hydroxyurea [King, 1975], mitomycin C [Kuhns, 1975], inhibitors of polamine metabolism [Kim, Byers & McCann, 1987], and various inhibitors of mitochondrial macromolecule synthesis [Akins & Byers, 1980; Akins, 1981]. One of the most important result of these studies was the discovery of a potent Encystment Enhancing Activity (EEA) that was released from amoebae during encystment was discovered [Akins & Byers, 1980; Akins, 1981; Akins, Gozs & Byers, 1985].  The activity was due to a small phosphorylated molecule that has not yet been further identified. Due to the ready stimulation of encystment by inhibitors of mitochondrial macromolecule synthesis and the association of EEA with a mitochondrial fraction, it was speculated that it might be a mitochondrial product [Akins, 1981].  A second important result from the studies of drug-induced encystment was the recognition that some of the agents commonly used to treat Acanthamoeba keratitis probably have the counterproductive effect of inducing cyst formation.

Return to top of page.



Antibiotic resistance.
 
In early studies on cell differentiation, cultures were consistently responsive to metabolic inhibitors that induced encystment.  Later, it became evident that cultures were developing resistance to the inhibitors. Therefore, we began a study of antibiotic resistance.  We found that Acanthamoeba readily developed resistance of cell multiplication to several antibiotics that affected mitochondrial processes as well, certainly, as other targets [Seilhamer & Byers, 1978; Byers, Akins & seilhamer, 1981; Akins, 1981].  It then was demonstrated that ATPase activity of mitochondria isolated from oligomycin resistant amoebae also exhibited resistance to the inhibitor [Seilhamer & Byers, 1982].  Several of the inhibitors tested were related to diamidines used as chemotherapeutic agents for Acanthamoeba keratitis. In a recent study, we were able to confirm that a single strain of Acanthamoeba developed resistance to propamidine in the eye of a patient during therapy for keratitis. Thus, we recommend the desirability of using a dual drug or multidrug therapy for treatment of Acanthamoeba infections [Ledee, Seal & Byers, In preparation].

Return to top of page.



Mode of reproduction.
 
The question of whether Acanthamoeba reproduces entirely by asexual means, or whether there is some mechanism for genetic exchange has been a continuing puzzle.  The availability of drug resistance markers enabled us to explore   whether they could be used to determine if genetic exchange occurs in Acanthamoeba. Approaches used included co-incubating amoebae with different resistance markers [Akins, 1981], or incubating drug-sensitive amoebae with mitochondria from drug-resistant amoebae [D. Zarley, unpublished].  Ambiguous results were obtained. In some cases, recombination of resistance markers, or the acquisition of resistance following exposure to resistant mitochondria, appeared to be achieved, but these effects were short-lived and not consistently repeatable.

Return to top of page.



Molecular phylogeny-based taxonomy.
 
 
Mitochondrial DNA  RFLP.
Multiple alleles.
Group I introns of nuclear 18S rRNA genes.
Mitochondrial tRNA sequences and editing.
Sequences of nuclear and mitochondrial small subunit rRNA genes and mitochondrial tRNA genes.

In the 1980's, ophthalmologists became increasingly interested in Acanthamoeba keratitis. This generated concerns about the reliability of methods for identification and classification of Acanthamoeba isolates.  Identification of the amoebae at the genus level is not difficult for individuals trained in recognition of Acanthamoeba, but is a problem for the untrained. Classification at the species level is a problem, however, even for experts.  Better criteria are needed for assessing the relatedness of various isolates both for clinical purposes and for basic biological studies. Thus, we turned our attention to solving this problem.  Our first goal was to find a reliable molecular basis for examining relaltionships among isolates and creating a molecular phylogeny-based taxonomy of the genus.  Our second goal was to develop very sensitive probes that could detect and reliably identify amoebae in infections.  Similar probes should be useful for environmental/biodiversity studies as well.

 

Restriction fragment length polymorphisms of
mitochondrial DNA (mt RFLP).
 
We first used mtRFLP to differentiate isolates of Acanthamoeba [Zarley, 1979; Bogler, Zarley, Burianek et al., 1983; Byers, Bogler & Burianek, 1983; Byers, 1983; Hugo, 1986]. We abandoned these studies because they did not look promising.  However, other laboratories subsequently have used them sucessfully.
 

Multiple alleles.
 
In the large majority of isolates studied, we found evidence for only one nuclear 18S rDNA allele.  In a few cases, evidence was found for more than one allele [Ledee, 1995; Ledee, Fuerst & Byers, in preparation]. No evidence was found for multiple alleles of the mitochondrial 16S rDNA.  Where multiple alleles occurred, they all fell within the same 18S rDNA sequence type (i.e. lineage).
 

Group I introns of nuclear 18S rRNA genes.
 
Sequence types T3 and T5, which are the A. griffini and A. lenticulata lineages, are unique in the genus because they each include some isolates with group I introns in the 18S rRNA genes [Gast, Fuerst & Byers, 1994; Schroeder-Diedrich, Fuerst & Byers, Submitted].  Individual isolates have a maximum of one of these introns. The intron is found at a single position In A. griffini, but at one of three different positions in A. lenticulata. The intron sequences are very different at the three different positions in A. lenticulata. Distributions of introns among isolates within these two species suggest that all four intron types were acquired following branching of the lineages and that intron loss also may have occurred several times subsequently. The sequence of the A griffini intron suggests that it may have been acquired horizontally from a green alga, possibly a prey organism, but there is no strong evidence that the same is true for any of the A. lenticulata intron types.
 

Mitochondrial tRNA sequences and editing.
 
Evidence for mitochondrial tRNA editing in Acanthamoeba originally was demonstrated in the laboratory of Michael Gray. Our analysis of sequences for 5 tRNA genes from each of 16 isolates supports and supplements the conclusions from Gray's laboratory. The observed sequence variation also is consistent with the 18S rRNA gene phylogeny [Ledee, Fuerst & Byers, In preparation].
 

Sequences of nuclear and mitochondrial small subunit
rRNA genes and mitochondrial tRNA genes.
 
We next turned to sequences of nuclear small subunit 18S rRNA genes (18S rDNA) for phylogenetic studies because of the increased information content and the large amount of available information about rRNA phylogeny in other organisms. We now have partial to complete 18S rDNA sequences for at least 75 isolates.  To date, this approach has produced a phylogeny for 17 of the 20+ described species of Acanthamoeba and has identified 12 distinct rDNA lineages referred to as sequence types T1-T12 [Gast, Fuerst & Byers, 1966; Stothard et al., 1998].   Support for the 18S rDNA phylogeny has been obtained from examination of the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene phylogeny and sequence variation among mitochondrial tRNA genes [Ledee, 1995; Ledee, Fuerst & Byers, in preparation].  Preliminary data suggest that there is some consistency between the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene sequence data and RFLPs for the complete mitochondrial genome.

Return to top of page.



Use of 18S rDNA sequences in identification of isolates.
 
 
Direct sequencing
 Phylogeny-based PCR and in situ probes
 

Direct sequencing.
 
Practical application of the identification methods is currently underway. A comparison of 18S rDNA sequences and the presence of a unique intron allowed us to identify A. griffini from an AK isolate and to establish a connection between the infectious agent, the patient's contact lens case, and the home water supply [Ledee. Hay. Seal et al., 1996].  Numerous other human and environmental isolates also have been identified by sequencing. In most cases, identification was based on the complete 2300-3000 bp gene sequence, but a much shorter "diagnostic fragment" now is in use.
 

Phylogeny-based PCR and in situ probes.
 
The 18S rRNA gene sequences have been used as a basis for designing PCR and FISH probes that are either genus-specific or specific for the T4 sequence type. [Stothard, Seal & Byers, in preparation; Schroeder-Diedrich, Seal & Byers, in preparation] Both types of probes have been tested successfully on laboratory cultures of all 12 sequence types, on human corneal scrape specimens and on acanthamoebae isolated from fish tissues.

Return to top of page.
 


Return to Dr. Tom Byers' Home Page.